
'Free' advert supported streaming service
Spotify launched in October 2008, and has quickly become the most talked about music application across
online and
print platforms.
It arrived with substantial media coverage in the UK on 10th February this year, and support shows no sign of diminishing as user numbers increase (as of 2nd March
Spotify boasted 1 million users from Western Europe and the UK) and record labels sign up their artists for streaming (tracks are added daily to the existing four million).
Spotify's easy on the eye design and functionality has gained many followers. And despite muso's complaining about the depth of
Spotify's current catalogue and a
security scare earlier this month, the application has challenged your average music fan as to the merits of their 'gathering dust' CD collection.
Why is it surprising that streaming a song takes up as much as downloading one? How do you think you're listinening to it, you're downloading it?
ReplyDeleteThis was a blog for music fans, not computer geeks and its something i didn't know, cheers alistair.
ReplyDeleteDear Anon,
ReplyDeleteThe point I was trying to make in the post is that streaming services have generally been portrayed in the media / PR'd as a FREE and ARTIST SUPPORTING alternative to illegal downloads.
However, streaming bandwith usage is rarely picked out in 'future of music' type discussions and is an issue I felt needed highlighting.
I feel there is a general view of streaming as 'free, easy and taking a small space' and potentially ISP's could exploit customers who are not aware of their bandwith use.
And Dave, I could probably be described as a music computer geek!
Open door to everyone...
Thought Spotify was fantastic service, no realise its a bit rubbish. Big Bandwith not a Big Solution.
ReplyDeleteSpotify caches music. Increase the cache size.
ReplyDelete